On the 'Mahdi'
Today, we come on a most
controversial subject, even among Muslims, and that is the advent of the Mahdi.
Both the second advent of the Messiah, as well as the Mahdi of the Last Days represent each a prophecy
in itself, such a prophecy which links the both of them: Messiah and Mahdi.
Bear in mind that “Mahdi” is derived from the
word, “Haadi”, which means “to guide” and “Massih” means “the
Anointed One”. Now, the term “anointed” refers to the ritual act of pouring or
rubbing oil on a person as a sign of sanctification. In a broader sense, it
signifies being chosen or set apart for a special purpose or role. We use “anointed”
not just for prophets but for kings as well when they are chosen to rule over
their kingdom.
When we study the information on Mahdi, we
notice that he is not directly and clearly mentioned in the Holy Quran as well
as the two most authentic Books of Hadiths in Islam, i.e. Sahih Al-Bukhari and
Muslim. There are many narrations on Mahdi, the larger part of them being
qualified as weak (Da’if) or not so authentic by the Muslim Ummah. But
then, if Mahdi is not plainly mentioned in Quran and both Imam Bukhari and Imam
Muslim have avoided mentioning him in their respective Sahihs, how then to be
sure that one Hadith which the Muslim Ummah regards as weak (Da’if) can
actually be powerfully true and be fulfilled in this era?