Thursday, April 3, 2014
The Triumph of Divine Servants
Holy Prophet Muhammad (sa) states:
- (Sunan Ibn-e-Majah,
Kitabul-Fitan, Babu Khurujil-Mahdi, Hadith no. 4074)
The Promised Massih Hadhrat Ahmad (as) says
in Arabic:
Laa waliya ba'di illallazi howa minni wa ala ahdi- There is no Wali after me except one who comes from me and has a
relationship with me. [“ Khutbah
Ilhamiyyah”, Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 16,
pp.69-70; Internet Edition ]
Friday, March 28, 2014
Uniting the Muslim Ummah: the Big Question
An Encounter with the Mullahs in Triolet
On Thursday 20 February 2014, I was in the North of Mauritius in one of its biggest
villages called Triolet. On the way I met two Mullahs coming from Bangladesh.
They presented themselves to me after greeting Salaam, and with very good and
sweet words they invited me in the mosque at about 10:00a.m. I met many other
Muslims coming from Bangalore and India. They asked me my name and before I
have finished giving my full name, when I reached: Munir Ahmad, one of the
Mullahs told me that his Burzuq’s
name is Munir Ahmed, but then when I gave completed my full name: Munir Ahmad Azim, all of them looked at
me with big surprised eyes and they suddenly turned aggressive.
Gone were the good and
sweet words! Their tone changed and they immediately asked me: “You
have proclaimed that you are the Mohyuddin, Khalifatullah etc.”
Without any hesitation and fear to creatures, although they
were in great numbers in the mosques, I
replied them in the affirmative.
They then asked me a
series of questions pertaining to the titles I have received from Allah,
wanting to know who told me that I was the Khalifatullah, Mohyuddin etc. I told
them that it is my Creator, my Rab, in whose hands my life, health, food,
dignity and honour are found. They did not believe me and called me liar
and thus started a debate on the finality of prophethood in which they believe.
Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah as Final Guidance
Among other questions
concerning the Mahdi and Messiah to come, they put to me put a question to me
regarding a Hadith, “I have left
for you the Book of Allah and the Sunnah, if you hold fast to it you will never
go astray.”
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Mubahila: Khalifa Sani and the Ahmadiyya Sects
Today, among the followers, or those who have accepted the claims, of the Promised Massih Hadhrat Ahmad (as)
in the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya, one can count six different, denominational sects: Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Qadian, Anjuman Ahmadiyya
Lahore, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Al Muslemun, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Islah Pasand, Jamaat
Ul Sahih Al Islam and the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Haquiqui.
The recent Mubahila between two of the Ahmadiyya sects- Jamaat
Ul Sahih Al Islam and the Jamaat-e-
Ahmadiyya Islah Pasand is entering into a different stage now, with the
Mujaddid claimant Abdul Ghaffar Janbah Sahib and his Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Islah Pasand declaring for himself a “clear victory”
through his recent speeches. The boastful claims from the Janbah Sahib came after
the completion of two years of publishing/uploading the official Mubahila
Document in the respective official websites.
In contrast to the approach
of the Janbah Sahib, Hadhrat Imam Muhyi-ud-Din Munir Ahmad Azim Sahib (atba) and the Jamaat Ul Sahih Al Islam has taken the position that the Janbah Sahib is
gravely mistaken in his approach and perceptions and also in his appreciation
for himself in the context of the Mubahila. Janbah Sahib is ignoring a profound
fact about the situation: he had entered into the Mubahila, half-hearted and reluctant,
as is so apparent from the way he conducted himself and his failure in
fulfilling the simple procedural requirements in their full measure. He should
not have abused the fact that Allah (twa) is compassionate and overlooks the
mistakes and sometimes extends the days of people in His Wisdom. Insha Allah, the
Jamaat Ul Sahih Al Islam is certain to serve the purpose of renewal of faith in
our times, and there are glad tidings for those who are steadfast and do good
deeds in the path of Allah.
The result/consequences of
the Mubahila is itself a trial for the believers, especially for all Ahmadis
found in the various sects of Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya today. Given that all parties
to the Mubahila are alive and positive factors that give personal and
subjective satisfaction can be, and had been, shared from both ends, whose claims
of decisive victory needs to be accepted may yet remain shrouded for many believers, especially those who have veils over their eyes which haze their spiritual vision.
In his Friday Sermon of March 21, 2014 the Khalifatullah Hadhrat Munir Ahmad
Azim Sahib (atba) of Mauritius spoke about the questions that are most relevant
for those who analyse the Mubahila situation.
Monday, March 24, 2014
Nikah-related Sanctions in the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya
Ahmadis are among the finest and ardent advocates of freedom of conscience. Yet, the Jamaat today is practicing thought control through intimidatory strategies of expulsion and boycott. If an Ahmadi today wholeheartedly believes in the continuity of Divine guidance as explained in the tenets of the Promised Massih (as) and acts upon that belief by recognizing and accepting the new Divine Manifestation, he or she could and would be expelled by the Jamaat system. Such a person is further liable to be socially boycotted by the community of his own people. Individual Ahmadis, including close relatives, are obliged by the system to break the ties of kinship with those who accept the new Mujaddid.
A central offence is deemed to be committed by, or attributed to, a member when he or she invites such a relative to the family functions, including Nikah. The punishment for such independence of thought may range from loss of office functions to even the expulsion from Nizam and the common workers are deprived of their basic rights and even their very livelihoods. The scales of justice are blatantly uneven and tilted invariably in favour of the elites and their cronies who can and will manipulate the unscrupulous in the system to get out of difficult situations. The situation in Maurititus is illustrative of the wider malaise of thought control, lack of empathy and dreadful intolerance, systemic injustice and mindless nepotism plaguing the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya today.
Sunday, March 23, 2014
Ahmadi Elites and the Politics of Boycott
‘Will a Mujaddid come after You?’
A man asked this pertinent question to the Promised Massih Hadhrat Ahmad (as) on 29 September 1905, before
noon. And he [the Promised Messiah] replied:
“What is wrong with a Mujaddid
coming after me? The
prophethood of Moses (as) had come to an end, and that is why his chain of
successors ended with Jesus (as). However, the dispensation of the Holy Prophet
Muhammad (sa) will last till the Day of Judgment through the Mujaddidin who will arise in it till the
Day of Judgment. As long as the Day of Judgment withholds its
destruction, there is no doubt that someone else could come. We most certainly
do not deny that good and righteous people will continue to come, and then all
of a sudden the Day of Judgment will come.” ( Ruhani Khaza’in, p. 16180 , Malfoozat.
volume 4, page 452; (2008 edn.)
Despite the existence and vital presence of
this important instruction from the Promised Massih (as) in his writings, endorsed
by the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya through its own series of publications, the Ahmadi
scholars today challenge common sense. They assault the intellects of Ahmadis
and their spiritual expectations. The Ulema and the chiefs declare with their own
mouths that no Mujaddid will ever come, even in a new century of Islam. They, thus,
foreclose the possibility of any discussion on spiritual blessings possible in
this age. The hedonistic elites of the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya in Mauritius enforce
the policy of intimidation and social stigma on those who wish to know about the
new Divine Manifestation.
I ask these arrogant people who are taking
themselves as great scholars in the Jamaat
Ahmadiyya : Where have they seen that they must
establish boycott? Is there a Quranic verse which stipulates to boycott someone
who receives divine revelations and those who have believed in the revelations
which he is receiving from Allah, and to expel them from the Jamaat Ahmadiyya
and boycott them?
Prove this to me, or even show me a Hadith
on this subject. Prove if you can, and prove also if even their family members
had to break ties (of kinship) with them and not to greet them Salam and not to
invite them. What law have they applied? The Quranic law? The rulings of Hazrat
Muhammad (saw) and Hazrat Massih Ma’ud (as)? The law of
the country?
Rule
by Family Elites in the Mauritius Jamaat
Or have they invented their own laws to make
people fear them, because the Jamaat
Ahmadiyya of Mauritius is governed by only a handful of families: Taujoo,
Jowahir, Sookia etc.? As
if there exist no other people in this Jamaat who can take care of the Jamaat
Ahmadiyya in Mauritius.
Years
go by, new years come, the same people are found at the head of the Jamaat! In the several programmes also, they are the ones to come forward to
get honour, as if there are no other wise people, even better than them, who
can come and address them on the question of religion! This is a Jamaat which is managed only by a handful of families, family
feelings!
Friday, March 21, 2014
‘Janbah Sahib, Allah does not like the Boastful’
“Innallaaha laa yuhibbu man-kaana
mukh-taalan-fakhuuraa” (4:
37)
Allah does not like those who are self-deluding and
boastful.
In his Friday Sermon delivered on 07 March 2014 in
Urdu, Abdul Ghaffar Janbah Sahib is rejoicing with boastfulness and arrogance
that he is enjoying good health and has his mission spread in the world, and he
even went as far as to say that he shall live till at least 80 years old, thus
saying that the Mubahila had no real effect on him.
He does not say that he has acted with treachery on
the question, when he and his disciple Mansoor Ahmed signed on the Mubahila (so
as to come in the court of Allah to let Allah the Great decide who between the
two: the Musleh Ma’ud (as) or him, is true especially with the bad words and
names they said against him. Abdul Ghaffar Janbah Sahib also stated that the
prophecy which Hazrat Massih Ma’ud (as) received was for him, that he is that
Zaki Ghulam and that the Musleh Ma’ud (as) was false). Therefore despite
signing, yet he did not date his Mubahila form.
They acted with treachery and were not straightforward
or valorous. They did not put on the date, month and year so that world may see
where truth shall triumph. He also stated that his Jamaat has spread
everywhere, yet he did not mention his Jamaat in the signed Mubahila
form/document.
On the other hand, we the Jamaat Ul Sahih Al Islam
firmly believe in Hazrat Massih Ma’ud (as) and the prophecy he made about Allah
the Great bestowing upon him a pious son etc., and we believe firmly in the
Musleh Ma’ud (as) and we – the Jamaat Ul Sahih Al Islam – and especially my
disciple Fazil Jamal Sahib and I entered in a Mubahila with Abdul Ghaffar
Janbah Sahib and his Jamaat, but despite him signing (on the Mubahila form)
along with his disciple Mansoor Ahmed, but he did not come as an equal with his
Jamaat, unlike this humble self who have come with my Jamaat. Without doubt, “Innallaaha Azaabam
Muhiinaa” – Allah shall humiliate them. (Revelation)
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Social Boycott in the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya
The
Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya has a standing official policy of socially boycotting all those who have accepted the Divine servant,
Hadhrat Munir Ahmad Azim Sahib (atba) of Mauritius. Ever
since the official expulsion of this recipient of Divine Revelations in the
year 2001, the leadership has been hell-bent on dissuading the common folks
from taking spiritual benefit and solace from recognizing the Messenger of
Allah.
The policy means that members of the Qadian Jamaat are encouraged to
break up the ties of blood and of family and kinship with their close relatives
and family friends, only because the latter chose to follow and thereby,
exercise their freedom of conscience, personal conviction, and individual
choice on a question of profound spiritual import for all Muslims- the Islamic duty and spiritual obligation to recognize and accept and
work with the Divine Elect of their times.
Yet,
the Jamaat seeks to defend the indefensible. They mix and blur the legitimate
and the prohibited- to make it look like the good and the bad are
indistinguishable. For that, they even drag in the name of the Holy Prophet of
Islam (sa) himself, to argue that social boycott was practiced even in early
Islam. To delude themselves that the Holy Prophet (sa) is on their side in
this.
The
duplicity and stupidity of the social boycott agenda is self-evident in its
contradictory strands and ironic implications. The same Ahmadis who boycott their
fathers and brothers and sisters for accepting the Divine Manifestation have no qualms about joining atheists,
Hindus, Christians, other Muslims and even pagans in all that they do. They
take themselves as lords beside Allah. Yet, the present Khalifa is not a
Messenger of Allah, with a divinely commissioned role and it is a mere boasting
of vain desires that he has a religious mandate to boycott a servant of Allah. Despite
the grand-standing, the chiefs in the Jamaat betray the grip of a fear
psychosis in their tantrums: that the common folks may eventually see through the gaping holes, break the ranks and join the
Mujaddid and by way of abundant ‘caution’, they have instituted the boycott
programme.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)